I think it is primary too easy to dismiss the option that Dawkins is way less scientific then he pretends to me and possible a quired minor form of ai psychosis.
I think it is primary too easy to dismiss the option that Dawkins is way less scientific then he pretends to me and possible a quired minor form of ai psychosis.
Likely. I'm convinced 'AI psychosis' is a developmental phase that everyone is subject to. It just gets manifested in character unique ways. I think part of it is the result of an internal struggle AI evokes which leads to a new form of humbling no one is exempt from.
Conciseness itself has always seemed to me a silly concept. My whole life I have not come across a simple definition but many sophists pin their existence on it.