> The point of using the term autocomplete is to make the underlying technology relatable and remove the mystic from it.

I think it fails to do that. It's the wrong level of abstraction. Or is it helpful to model an ISA as the individual atoms making up a CPU implementing it?

> Every single discussion on the internet is a repeat of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki%27s_wager it seems…

If you don't like that, why amplify it by throwing around known unhelpful categories?

I don’t think I do, obviously. And have no interest discussing where arbitrary boundaries are located