I don't know why anyone is still using this - much less defending them..

In the last MONTH, I've asked how you can defend implementing (or even choose implementing) AI when:

the AI you have implemented throughout your company changes the results you've come to trust? https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/13/claude_outage_quality...

or won't let you log in?: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/44257

or makes stuff up?: https://dwyer.co.za/static/claude-mixes-up-who-said-what-and...

or when it's down?: https://status.claude.com/incidents/6jd2m42f8mld

or when you get banned?: https://bannedbyanthropic.com/

or installs spyware: https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/anthropic-spyware/

or takes the features you use out of the plan you subscribe to without notice? https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/22/anthropic_removes_cla...

or renders your IP legally unenforceable? https://legallayer.substack.com/p/who-owns-the-claude-code-w...

or stealthily changes pricing terms based on... file names you have? https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/53262

or invoices you for usage you did not perform, and won't answer support requests until you raise hell on social media? https://nickvecchioni.github.io/thoughts/2026/04/08/anthropi...

i mean seriously, why on earth would you use this? i thought we were professionals