Pasted it into Pangram AI and it classified the article as 100% AI generated, so take that as you will...

Ironically making the case for the thesis of the piece - what happens when you let A.I. do all the thinking instead of exercising competent judgement. Disclaimers and leaving real thought to others do not make it much better. Pangram is confidently wrong here.

Then why is the title photo very obviously AI? I feel like you get people on alert off the bat