The robots use it a lot because it's a common construct in their training data, because it's a common construct in text written by humans
The robots use it a lot because it's a common construct in their training data, because it's a common construct in text written by humans
i’ve caught myself doing the “it’s this and that — it’s not the other” thing a few times. i dunno if it’s because i’ve seen it so many times because of AI generated comments etc and that’s become a norm in my brain, or if it was actually something i do regularly and ive just never noticed it.
it might be the latter, because i always got the title of this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02175 backwards. i used to write it adversarial examples are features, not bugs (which is apparently not correct in english language 0_o)
regardless, ive started editing it out when i notice ive done it now.
it’s a common construct in human text *selected for the most engaging constructs by AI companies optimizing their usage metrics
Obviously any comment that doesn't match the responders exact style must be AI /s.