> “I didn’t know what the problem was—I was just doing Erdős problems as I do sometimes, giving them to the AI and seeing what it can come up with,” he says. “And it came up with what looked like a right solution.” He sent it to his occasional collaborator Kevin Barreto, a second-year undergraduate in mathematics at the University of Cambridge.

Seems like standard 23 year old behavior. You're spending $100-$200/mo on the pro subscription, and want to get your money's worth. So you burn some tokens on this legendarily hard math problem sometimes. You've seen enough wrong answers to know that this one looks interesting and pass it on to a friend that actually knows math, who is at a place where experts can recognize it as correct.

Seems like a classic example of in-expert human labeling ML output.

According to the article he was using the free ChatGpt tier at first, I til someone gifted him a Pro subscription to encourage "vibe-mathing'.

Couldn't he have just asked ChatGPT if it was correct? Why do we still feel the need to loop in a human?

Because society is run by humans, not chatpgt.