> Yes, and your comment contrasts heavily with the reality of using LLMs as code assistants, as conveyed in comments such as "a whole new layer of lossy interpretation. This is profoundly wrong, even if you use LLMs naively.

Most people, when told they sound condescending, try to reframe their argument in order to remove this and become more convincing.

Sadly, you chose to double down instead. Not worth pursuing.

> This isn't theoretical, it's month's old stuf

Hahaha! "Months old stuff"!

Disengaging from this conversation. Over and out.