Just noting that I saw this, but I don't really see a point in replying outside of this comment at this time because I don't feel the need to prove myself to you, and I don't know how I could change what I'm writing to satisfy you personally anyways.
Whatever you're trying to imply here, it's a personal attack that does not contribute to the discourse.
The OP is coyling spraying half baked questions across discussion in an effort to do who knows what. It is an attack on the delivery, not the person.
Just noting that I saw this, but I don't really see a point in replying outside of this comment at this time because I don't feel the need to prove myself to you, and I don't know how I could change what I'm writing to satisfy you personally anyways.
Have a nice evening!
No, nothing of the sort is happening. There is no reason to assume bad faith in those questions. The questions are not "half-baked".
I make such dismissals because if I merely expressed doubt, it appears that you would make the same accusations against me.
The burden of proof is on you; what is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence; etc.