What is the point of making up claims of "extreme" performance without any accompanying benchmarks or comparisons?
It really should be shameful to use unqualified adjectives in headline claims without also providing the supporting evidence.
What is the point of making up claims of "extreme" performance without any accompanying benchmarks or comparisons?
It really should be shameful to use unqualified adjectives in headline claims without also providing the supporting evidence.
I agree, I'll try adding some. We use the tool on a benchmarking platform so we run this thing hundreads of times daily and did dozens of tests against pretty much every other load generator (that I know of). Numbers are also always tied to the hardware where you run it and typically benchmarks provided by the maintainer himself are always biased and won't match what you get though.
I personally never care about benchmarks presented, it's much better to use and see for myself so didn't think much about having a table with values there but I can understand how it may help.
did you scroll down?
I did and I still didn't see any numbers. Just a bunch of AI generated text about why it's supposedly fast. It even says it records numbers multiple times, so why aren't there any presented?