Woah. Dude has a running PDP-11/34 in 2026? Personally, I find that more impressive than the program.

Not only that, but the author has also written a cycle-accurate PDP-11/34 simulator for the benefit of those who do not have such hardware.

https://github.com/dbrll/ll-34

The WASM GUI is probably the easiest way to see the Transformer in action on this machine: https://dbrll.github.io/ll-34/

There's also the original Tetris from 1984 to play.

That thing is a Tamagochi though, it constantly needs attention, pardon the pun. I did most of the development and tuning on ll-34 for that reason.

I am a bit surprised, but I guess everything eventually wears out.

In the 1980's I worked as a field engineer that supported a lot of pdp-11's. They were very reliable for the time; tape drives and disks were the #1 maintenance items. To actually have to open up the processor and change a board was not a regular activity.

Other machines of that era, like those from Gould or Perkin/Elmer or DG gave regular practice in the art of repairing processors.

Guess I expect them to work forever. Like a Toyota.

I encouter two main failure modes. First, the bipolar PROMs degrade at the atomic level, the metal ions in the fuses tend to migrate or 'regrow' over decades, causing bit rot. Second, the backplanes suffer from mechanical fatigue. After forty years of thermal expansion and structural flexing, especially when inserting boards, the traces and solder joints develop stress cracks. Both are a pain to repair.

https://retrocmp.com/articles/trying-to-fix-a-dec-pdp-1134-b...

Excellent work.

The feeling of accomplishment when the machine boots after a major repair (almost) makes it all worth while.

(i think i would have found a used backplane...fixing it was crazy clever)