Wow so many replies.

I think it goes down in two camps. AI is improving on these issues and people countering.

I don’t know for sure, but to me it seems the last 2 years weren’t necessarily 'intelligence' improvements but post-training improvement and tool connections, also reduced censorship.

I’m know using less AI than ever and I’ve been burning 1000USD/month before Claude Code. I have a couple of really fundamental functions built that help me to solve a big chunk of specific problems I can built a lot on that. Adding functionality became easier not more complicated.

I would think for these business problems that I’m facing AI is less than 30% of the time right. For example deciding on how to setup databases for max efficiency how to write efficient queries. Everything that in the end is really moat to you compared to your vibe coded competitors.

From my personal experience I’ve seen a lot of vibe-cded companies stuck and barely adding nec functionality or features and my guess is that they don’t trust changes anymore.

So even if AI would be as good as a really good coder one thing would still be missing a person that is knowing exactly what is happening.

And I mean okay it might be writing a form real quick. But a modern form needs to do a lot of things and if you have established patterns for all kind of inputs, the implementation is mundane.

It’s like when you learn coding, type it yourself to learn. So if you can’t scale the AI only codebase at one point you have to learn it, and I argue right now most efficient way is to write in it.

And I’m also arguing that it’s really tough to get a software so good that it’s actually an asset on the market vibe-coded only. It seems like its more of a drug for wannapreneurs than it is actually building an asset.

Like it builds you a Netflix clone, but what you see is barely the code you need to write a Netflix competitor.