This is great. My only gripe is that it's still way too smart compared to most of the stuff I see on LinkedIn. If it had wrapped up with a "it's not X, it's Y", would've been perfect.
This is great. My only gripe is that it's still way too smart compared to most of the stuff I see on LinkedIn. If it had wrapped up with a "it's not X, it's Y", would've been perfect.
It also doesn't have enough "not" contrasts. "Not to remember what we say here, but to remember what was done here."
Then again maybe the quality of Lincoln's literacy defies it.
> Then again maybe the quality of Lincoln's literacy defies it.
I think so. My first thought reading this output is that I should ask the LLM to first write in the style of Lincoln and then slightly modernize the prose.
Everybody else looks for em dashes. For me that is the number 1 tell of AI.
Anybody else being annoyed by all this focus on em-dash use to detect AI? In no time, the bad guys will tell their BS machines to avoid em-dashes and "it's not X it's Y" and whatever else people use as "tell-tale signs" and eventually the training data will have picked up on that too. And people who genuinely use em-dashes for taste reasons or are otherwise using expressions considered typical for AI are getting a bad rep.
This is all just demonstrating the helplessness that's coming to our society w.r.t. dealing with gen AI output. Looking for em-dashes is not the solution and distracts from actually having to deal with the problem. (Which is not a technical but a social one. You can't solve it with tech.)
It's often the solution.
I keep reading about students are learning to intentionally write worse so that it doesn't get flagged as AI-generated. I think it's a systemic problem that won't be solved in the short term, unfortunately.
This is turning out to be a huge issue for me as my frequent use of em-dashes makes my remarks trigger people effectively disrupting attempts to communicate. Maybe my communication needs to change or maybe these objections are yet another red flag to watch for.
Just use -.
Why be wrong on purpose to placate people who are wrong out of ignorance?