I replied to the sibling comment: I was making simplifying assumptions for two specific use cases and naively treated physical cores and clock rate as my variables.
I replied to the sibling comment: I was making simplifying assumptions for two specific use cases and naively treated physical cores and clock rate as my variables.
Yes, but core count and clock speed of a nearly 10 year old CPU are meaningless when comparing to current processors.
But why? That's like trying to determine which car is faster by looking at only at the rpm.