Israel doesn't need to "compromise", Israel needs to withdraw from every inch of land that it occupies illegally. A few notes about the most significant examples you provided:

Netanyahu's statement on the Hebron protocol:

"We are using the time interval in the agreement to achieve our goals: to maintain the unity of Jerusalem [illegally occupied], to ensure the security depth necessary for the defence of the State, to insist on the right of Jews to settle in their land [i.e. further the illegal colonisation], and to propose to the Palestinians a suitable arrangement for self-rule but without the sovereign Powers which pose a threat to the State of Israel."

Wye River Memorandum- never implemented, Israel only withdrew from 2% of area C instead of the agreed 13%.

Gaza Disengagement Plan. In the words of Dov Weissglass, Sharon's senior adviser:

"The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process, and when you freeze that process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on the refugees, the borders and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda. And all this with authority and permission. All with a presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress. That is exactly what happened. You know, the term 'peace process' is a bundle of concepts and commitments. The peace process is the establishment of a Palestinian state with all the security risks that entails. The peace process is the evacuation of settlements, it's the return of refugees, it's the partition of Jerusalem. And all that has now been frozen.... what I effectively agreed to with the Americans was that part of the settlements would not be dealt with at all, and the rest will not be dealt with until the Palestinians turn into Finns. That is the significance of what we did."