I think the main quote from the article is important but the headline misses the point:

>> Markets are failing to adequately price or value biodiversity, such as filtration of pollutants, climate regulation and pollination.

It doesn't seem immediately obvious to me that growth rate of GDP is a direct proxy for this fact. How is GDP growth rate is a consequence of this or vice versa, rather than a second or third order effect?

I think plenty of people agree that an open and fair market also tries to price in externalities, especially ones that could end all life on the planet.