The problem isn’t the reading. The problem is the output based on somebody’s other work.
There is a reason why we call it styles, because it’s a recognizable pattern someone came up with maybe after decades of work.
The problem isn’t the reading. The problem is the output based on somebody’s other work.
There is a reason why we call it styles, because it’s a recognizable pattern someone came up with maybe after decades of work.
The "funny" thing is that we absolutely allow people to copy style... but somehow software isn't allowed to do that?
You don't even need to have a legally acquired source material to produce work in a certain style.
The new reality allows for original creators to actually track the chain, so we're in this situation.
If people would have the same mass output as software we wouldn’t allow that too.
If one or two people take an apple from your tree it’s not a big deal, if a machine takes 10,000 it is.