The FT article brings it up as well - most HNers never read the articles.
Most HNers don't have access to the article.
Not sure why this source was used. There are plenty of other sources that are more accessible/available (that are already shared and discussed here).
To be fair FT is a fantastic source. That’s why it costs as much as it does. But yeah the paywall sucks if you just want the one article.
Does that matter if the headline is conclusive of the article result? Financial Times is a costly subscription. Furthermore those details, while interesting, do not change the outcome of the article.
Most HNers don't have access to the article.
Not sure why this source was used. There are plenty of other sources that are more accessible/available (that are already shared and discussed here).
To be fair FT is a fantastic source. That’s why it costs as much as it does. But yeah the paywall sucks if you just want the one article.
Does that matter if the headline is conclusive of the article result? Financial Times is a costly subscription. Furthermore those details, while interesting, do not change the outcome of the article.