Anthropic and the military had a contract. The military wanted to change the terms of that contract. Anthropic said no, which is their clearly defined contractual right. They got labeled a supply chain risk. How is this anything other than a shakedown? Does contract law mean anything to this administration?
The other such labeled companies have contracts too.
10 USC 3252 has only been used once, against Acronis AG, a Swiss company with Russian connections.
Acronis did not have DOD contracts.
Other companies (Huawei) have been deemed risks under different laws, or by Congress, but they also didn't have direct DOD contracts.
Do you have any evidence for your assertion? Did you check if it is true before posting?
no, the other such labeled companies are foreign owned firms like Huawei that the government never intended to do business with in the first place