And why would they have an objection to that? They sold a product to a customer. They should have no business in how that customer uses their software.
And why would they have an objection to that? They sold a product to a customer. They should have no business in how that customer uses their software.
So firearms dealers should be fine with their customers going on mass murder sprees?
Is this a rethoric question?
Licensing is a thing. See requirements that, for example, GPL3 places on customers.
I'd hate to break it to you, but companies do have a right to determine how their products are used. You were subject to that when you wrote that comment. Did you not notice that?