What a weird formulation in the article. It makes it seem like the Senate wanted to block the Iran hostilities and failed to do so. But instead it voted against doing so.
Something about the wording seems dishonest though. Whoever sponsored the bill failed to get the senate to pass it.
The wording here makes it seem like the senate wanted this but failed to get it.
So again the senate failing to do something the senate said they did not want to do is weird.
It comes down to some people in the senate wanted this, but they are not the senate.
Politicians have been treating a minority position as the institution’s will for some time. It’s our job to look past that and not be fooled even if you share the same minority position.
What a weird formulation in the article. It makes it seem like the Senate wanted to block the Iran hostilities and failed to do so. But instead it voted against doing so.
There was a vote to block it and the vote failed to pass, hence they failed to block it.
Something about the wording seems dishonest though. Whoever sponsored the bill failed to get the senate to pass it.
The wording here makes it seem like the senate wanted this but failed to get it.
So again the senate failing to do something the senate said they did not want to do is weird.
It comes down to some people in the senate wanted this, but they are not the senate.
Politicians have been treating a minority position as the institution’s will for some time. It’s our job to look past that and not be fooled even if you share the same minority position.
The voting failed with a small number I think 53 / 47
It was gonna be vetoed anyway