> It's incredible that about 80% of people in this thread seem to be commenting without having looked at the website.

In defence of the 80%, there is no indication in any section other than the About page that it is not real money (with the possible exception of the suspiciously high sums of money), and most commercial services have fairly useless About pages. The HN headline presents it as if it's real.

A far cry from GP's implication that "inadvertently click[ing] on the website" is sufficient to see this.