I fail to understand why 888 KiB matters if it's just a wrapper around a cloud api.
Have you seen OpenClaw's codebase? 680.000 LOC.
I care how big it is.
A lot of the *claws emphasize binary size and lines of code. I think for better or worse people treat codebase size as a proxy for "how much of the project is unsupervised, unmaintainable, buggy AI slop?"
8 is lucky number in China
Because of resource-constrained environments, the primary deployment target seem to be microcontrollers. You can get ESP32 boards for pretty cheap.
Because it means you can run it on an ESP32 which is a low power microprocessor package.
Have you seen OpenClaw's codebase? 680.000 LOC.
I care how big it is.
A lot of the *claws emphasize binary size and lines of code. I think for better or worse people treat codebase size as a proxy for "how much of the project is unsupervised, unmaintainable, buggy AI slop?"
8 is lucky number in China
Because of resource-constrained environments, the primary deployment target seem to be microcontrollers. You can get ESP32 boards for pretty cheap.
Because it means you can run it on an ESP32 which is a low power microprocessor package.