Are you reading things before agreeing with them? Or thinking about them? It doesn't seem obvious these things are contradictory at all. That Politico reports so doesn't make it the case.

It is clear that the DPA can be invoked for companies posing risks to national security:

> On October 30, 2023, President Biden invoked the Defense Production Act to "require that developers of the most powerful AI systems share their safety test results and other critical information with the U.S. government" when "developing any foundation model that poses a serious risk to national security, national economic security, or national public health."

Furthermore, it should be quite obvious that companies very important for national security can act in manners causing them to be national security risks, meaning a varied approach is required.

> Are you reading things before agreeing with them?

No, unlike yourself, I'm just a random brainless bot.

That Biden stretched the definition for a questionable purpose doesn't change the original intent.