Was this because they were threatened with a fine?
> Was this because they were threatened with ~a fine~ being designated a supply chain risk?
Seems like it, yes.
or was it because they were threatened to being taken over by the US government?
> Was this because they were threatened with ~a fine~ being designated a supply chain risk?
Seems like it, yes.
or was it because they were threatened to being taken over by the US government?