Your own example undermines your point. Solyndra, a company, was part of a much larger Energy Department program that was profitable for the US government. Tesla itself was kept afloat by loans from this program [0]. This has all been well-reported, you can read up on it. [1]
Sure. But Mussolini made the trains run on time - right?
Can you give an example of one of these "useless" green programs?
> But Mussolini made the trains run on time - right?
making an inappropriate hand gesture is comparable to being a mass murderer?
> Can you give an example of one of these "useless" green programs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra
Your own example undermines your point. Solyndra, a company, was part of a much larger Energy Department program that was profitable for the US government. Tesla itself was kept afloat by loans from this program [0]. This has all been well-reported, you can read up on it. [1]
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2013/5/22/4356860/tesla-repays-465-...
[1] https://www.npr.org/2014/11/13/363572151/after-solyndra-loss...
The Goomba Fallacy strikes again.
Did Tesla's EVs reduce carbon emissions or not? You can't say it without contradicting your party/religion.
Pretty sure the science is settled on EVs and carbon emissions, is there something you find controversial?
Good doesn't wash away bad