This is actually the scariest part of the article for me.
It's clear we've got to the point where at a glance it is hard for those who are otherwise unaware to tell the difference between AI slop and organic content.
If nerds on HN can't tell the difference between an AI slop influencer and a fairly well-regarded human influencer... how can we expect the rest of the public to tell the difference when it comes to science, health, civics, politics, etc???
We're at the cusp of a distrust and misinformation cliff that is going to be terrifying in magnitude.
The article didn't suggest that the video mentioned was AI slop, it correctly recognised it as human generated.
Indeed. He thought it was not AI slop, but the kind of low-effort slop ruining Facebook.
Your opinions may vary, but this is not one of those super clickbaity social media personalities; people like her because she's funny.