The start of the article is good, but it starts to sound like LLM staring at the "Why this maps to Genetic Algorithms?" section. Is that the case?
The start of the article is good, but it starts to sound like LLM staring at the "Why this maps to Genetic Algorithms?" section. Is that the case?
An LLM was used to help polish the text, and that section probably got over-polished. The ideas and code are authentic. The article is intentionally detailed for those who want the full reasoning, but you can always skip straight to the source code.