I would much rather have a democratically elected and constitutionally constrained government than private enterprise with limitless power. It would also be helpful if the “government is bad” people would stop electing the people who seek to sabotage the government.
When it's allegedly stored in the Secure Enclave and the data unable to leave the device, it is obviously not the same interaction. I personally would be fine with a law making that distinction with the on-device recognition as legal.
I would much rather have a democratically elected and constitutionally constrained government than private enterprise with limitless power. It would also be helpful if the “government is bad” people would stop electing the people who seek to sabotage the government.
Facial recognition is not a legitimate private enterprise. It is a complete failure of legislation that it is allowed to exist.
Apple Face ID is not a good or legitimate feature? You just upset hundreds of millions of people
Most people miss Touch ID on the iPhone.
So biometrtics are OK as long as it's not your face? Trying to derive the first principle here.
When it's allegedly stored in the Secure Enclave and the data unable to leave the device, it is obviously not the same interaction. I personally would be fine with a law making that distinction with the on-device recognition as legal.