You’ve described a technology, not a solution to a clearly articulated problem that customers actually have. The problem that you have described is vague, and it’s unclear that it’s actually a problem at all. Finally, you don’t provide a persuasive and concrete argument about how your eventual solution—whatever that may be—will solve it.
I don’t mean to be so presumptuous as to teach Grampa how to suck eggs, but I think Amazon’s working backwards process is instructive.
Hey, is JJ compatibility in the cards? Considering the blog article hints at a goal of a developerless agent-to-agent automation platform I'm guessing developer conveniences are a side quest rn?
I am here. What did I not bother with? I wrote the blog post and it has all the details.
You’ve described a technology, not a solution to a clearly articulated problem that customers actually have. The problem that you have described is vague, and it’s unclear that it’s actually a problem at all. Finally, you don’t provide a persuasive and concrete argument about how your eventual solution—whatever that may be—will solve it.
I don’t mean to be so presumptuous as to teach Grampa how to suck eggs, but I think Amazon’s working backwards process is instructive.
Hey, is JJ compatibility in the cards? Considering the blog article hints at a goal of a developerless agent-to-agent automation platform I'm guessing developer conveniences are a side quest rn?
Yes, definitely something we are thinking of.
I am struggling to see what the details are other than high-level concepts. Perhaps a demo would be useful!
[dead]
Wow, account from 2011 and just two comments, both on this article. Welcome, lurker, and good luck :)
Thanks. New startup, new approach.
[flagged]
Please don't cross into personal attack in HN comments.
You may not owe ex-Github-CEOs better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
[flagged]