The response appears to be pointing out that with so many employees (engineers), it's unlikely that they all work on Windows.
The response appears to be pointing out that with so many employees (engineers), it's unlikely that they all work on Windows.
Maybe. But interpreting it thus requires too much charitableness for it not to have been uncharitable, whether intentionally or otherwise.
And yet they still work for a company that has shown it isn’t overly concerned about quality or reliability in its products.
Thaaat's capitalism