Their "constitution" is just garbage meant to defend them ripping off copyrighted material with the excuse that "it's not plagiarizing, it thinks!!!!1" which is, false.
Their "constitution" is just garbage meant to defend them ripping off copyrighted material with the excuse that "it's not plagiarizing, it thinks!!!!1" which is, false.
I don't recall them ever offering that legal reasoning - I'm sure you can provide a citation?
Did using LLMs too much remove your ability to critically think too?
Just to be clear: you're mad because your "critical thinking" led you to a spurious argument that you disagree with, and that they never actually made?
You explicitly said: "the excuse that "it's not plagiarizing, it thinks!!!!1"", and it seems rather relevant that they've never actually used that excuse.