This is a great read, but note that it's specific to Windows and Dell/Lenovo/Microsoft.
Apple does it different(ly), and I'd argue more securely. Being able to specify the full chain of hardware, firmware, and software always has its advantages.
Apple's fingerprint readers do not perform authentication locally -- instead the data read from the sensor (or derivatives thereof) is compared to a reference which is stored in the secure enclave in the Apple silicon (Ax Tx or Mx) of the Mac or iOS device itself.
This is a great read, but note that it's specific to Windows and Dell/Lenovo/Microsoft.
Apple does it different(ly), and I'd argue more securely. Being able to specify the full chain of hardware, firmware, and software always has its advantages.
Apple's fingerprint readers do not perform authentication locally -- instead the data read from the sensor (or derivatives thereof) is compared to a reference which is stored in the secure enclave in the Apple silicon (Ax Tx or Mx) of the Mac or iOS device itself.