> GPT-2 (7 years ago): too dangerous to release.
With the benefit of hindsight you can see the the charitable foundation to benefit mankind was a grift all along.
> GPT-2 (7 years ago): too dangerous to release.
With the benefit of hindsight you can see the the charitable foundation to benefit mankind was a grift all along.
I'm not sure I agree. LLM's have the feel of an alien new technology, and especially did back then. In retrospect, it feels very obvious that small models don't pose much of a threat, but that's only in retrospect.
Nobody else should be allowed to build these ... while we build another model that is 10x more capable than the one that was a threat to humanity.
Sign up today to use it, just $10 a month.
The thing about dangerous AI is that AI will by definition not be dangerous precisely until it is.
This isn't a good reason to be reckless.
OpenAI’s transformation—from a nonprofit founded to serve humanity, to a for-profit prioritizing enterprise (B2B) revenue at the expense of everyday users—isn’t simply a shift in business model; it represents a fundamental abandonment of its original mission and of public trust.