"Sweden does not have a legislative definition of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)"
Because that is up to the courts to interpret. You cant use your common law experience to interpret the law in other countries.
"Sweden does not have a legislative definition of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)"
Because that is up to the courts to interpret. You cant use your common law experience to interpret the law in other countries.
> You cant use your common law experience to interpret the law in other countries.
That interpretation wasn't mine. It came from the Court of Europe doc I linked to. Feel free to let them know its wrong.
So aggressive and rude, and over... CSAM? Weird.
chrisjj has some atrocious takes. But supporting CSAM is the worst he has done by far.
I'm not supporting CSAM. I'm supporting the defence of the term CSAM from attempts at dilution and diminution which downplay the true severity of this appaling crime.
You just seem incredibly argumentative and unreasonable and do not seem to care about "this appalling crime" at all.