Licenses mean nothing if AI training on your data is fair use, which courts have yet to determine.
You can have a license that says "NO AI TRAINING EVER" in no uncertain terms and it would mean absolutely nothing because fair use isn't dictated by licenses.
Yet nobody is changing their licenses to exclude AI use. So I assume they are OK with it.
Licenses mean nothing if AI training on your data is fair use, which courts have yet to determine.
You can have a license that says "NO AI TRAINING EVER" in no uncertain terms and it would mean absolutely nothing because fair use isn't dictated by licenses.
[dead]
Which God are you talking about, and how do you believe they have communicated this?
What's the point of changing the license? It will be scrapped anyway.
'The only winning move is not to play' - stop contributing to OSS.
I would and people do but no one respects the license because it is largely uninforceable
[dead]