Not defending the buy but completely might be inaccurate. He has a masters in comp sci eng. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhu_Gottumukkala
I do realize this scholastic achievement is not indication he knows what he is doing.
Not defending the buy but completely might be inaccurate. He has a masters in comp sci eng. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhu_Gottumukkala
I do realize this scholastic achievement is not indication he knows what he is doing.
And an MBA. He seems like a lot of people I know who skim through their technical degrees just to get the credentials. And my experience is that Masters is often easier to get than a Bachelors.
Anyway what he did makes it abundantly clear that this person should not be head of security for anything.
A polygraph isn't a competency test.
It's a person reliability test and he failed it.
> It's a person reliability test and he failed it.
It does not have the capability to say whether the person is reliable. It is a bunch of pseudoscience, basically.
70-90% accuracy...
Doesn't matter. There's only 1 reason why someone wouldn't want to take 1
meh diploma mill is a dime a dozen in University of India
It’s from UT Arlington - does that even count?
Yes