> Government should not be in a position to directly and pervasively shape people’s understanding of the world.
You disagree with national curricula, state broadcasters, publicly funded research and public information campaigns?
> Government should not be in a position to directly and pervasively shape people’s understanding of the world.
You disagree with national curricula, state broadcasters, publicly funded research and public information campaigns?
Many Americans these days absolutely do disagree with all of those things. Educated ones. Theres simply a short circuit belief based pathway in peoples brains that bypasses everything rational on arbitrary topics.
Most of us used to see it as isolated to religion or niche political points, but increasingly everything os being swept into the "its political" camp.
Given “national curricula” of a dominant democratic country are undergoing a politically motivated change, starting with significant web materials, and moving into education …
Do you prefer the previous narratives? The latter? Or whatever you are told?
And that is the risk of relatively static information.
What if your information source was interactive, adaptive and motivated? And could record and report on your interactions and viewpoints?
[dead]