We could be building chatbot clones of Cicero or Samuel Pepys or even an asshole-genius like Feynman.
But that's all too good for us, we don't deserve goo things; we get dead pedophile bankers instead.
We could be building chatbot clones of Cicero or Samuel Pepys or even an asshole-genius like Feynman.
But that's all too good for us, we don't deserve goo things; we get dead pedophile bankers instead.
I think the absurdity is the whole point.
Likely, but it's just as absurd to think you'd get anything of value out of talking to a chatbot simulation of a genius. You'd do a better job of assigning yourself the problem of taking the voice of a vibrant historical persona...
Characters like that are available through system prompts on any LLM. Unfortunately I find the tone of the prose doesn't change much from one author to another, it's still very chatgptlike, but sprinkles in references to the topics the author might go on about.
Also there's not really evidence epstein was a banker, no one knows who was financing his operation or why millionaires would add to his portfolio without any expectation of returns, since, the money was never actually invested in anything
> Samuel Pepys
Mr. hazer con ella?
butt aren't you getting enough goo things during breakfast?