Don't let the perfect be the enemy of good.
Who cares if many can get around it, if the majority can't or won't, then it kills the network effects.
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of good.
Who cares if many can get around it, if the majority can't or won't, then it kills the network effects.
I don't think this is good though. It's a police state masquerading as "SAVE THE CHILDREN!"
yes, the police state is preventing Mark Zuckerberg from being a trillionaire.
I'm sorry. What?
This legislation is very much giving more power to the government over what its citizens cannot do. The real impetus is control by the powers that be. The ideal citizen for an authoritarian would be fully controllable via digital means. A digital id that is networked with services is a wet dream for authoritarians.
What does this have to do with limiting Zuck's net worth? Because less kids will see less ads? How much will this reduce his net worth? If we took licenses from kids and had them wait until 18, would you be claiming this is to prevent Musk from gaining more wealth?
The Australian law, as written, is not good. It names 10 specific platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Threads, etc) that must comply with the law. That means any social network that is not explicitly named can still happily serve children.