It’s not easy to express negative things. No matter how many neutral terms we invent, they become pejorative in the end and we have to invent new ones by switching the words around.
It’s not easy to express negative things. No matter how many neutral terms we invent, they become pejorative in the end and we have to invent new ones by switching the words around.
It's plenty easy to express negative things. What's not easy is convincing people that negative things are actually positive, which is why words that refer to negative things are perceived as being negative words.
Yep, like the word "retard" was a medical term when it was first coined.
So was “moron”. “Below average” is an insult too, yet we couldn’t ask for a more general term.
And it's still a perfectly neutral term in French, where your "Delayed" flight is "Retardé".
When was it first coined?
As a verb:
As a noun: ~ Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition (CD-ROM v. 4.0 © Oxford University Press 2009)Noun sense 4.4 there comes from the medical use, which is a euphemistic reference to verb sense 1.1.
I don't know whether the noun retard developed within medicine from the medical use. But this much is clear:
1. The word retarded (not retard) was employed in an effort to be technical and sensitive in referring to people with mental deficiencies;
2. The same word, retarded, entered general use in reference to people with (more broadly-construed) mental deficiencies;
3. The noun retard derived straightforwardly from retarded, in the sense "person who is retarded". This might have happened before step 2 and then entered general use in parallel with retarded, or it might have happened after step 2. Doesn't really matter.