Forking a project when the issue is that half of the staff left the project does nothing to alleviate the staffing issue, does it?
Forking a project when the issue is that half of the staff left the project does nothing to alleviate the staffing issue, does it?
So what is it, in one comment you say there were plenty of x11 devs who objected to wayland (please name and show the posts) and on the other hand you say there were not enough to keep an xorg fork going?
People are arguing that fixing the issues in X11 would have been much easier and less work than making wayland. So why could those half of x11 developers who left make wayland while the other half that was left over could not even make one release?
Isn't that the greatness of FOSS over commercial software that keeps being spoken about?