Some version of this comment shows up in just about every HN comment thread on a blog post. It must be LLM-generated.
His criticism is valid. Not his fault most blog posts are AI slop these days.
Overzealous pattern matching is not criticism.
Ok, why can I not just read the prompt that went in? Why do I need to read a verbosified version of it? What's the point?
Why must you insist it's LLM-generated based on formatting and feel? What if this is just how the author writes? This is what I mean by overzealous pattern matching.
His criticism is valid. Not his fault most blog posts are AI slop these days.
Overzealous pattern matching is not criticism.
Ok, why can I not just read the prompt that went in? Why do I need to read a verbosified version of it? What's the point?
Why must you insist it's LLM-generated based on formatting and feel? What if this is just how the author writes? This is what I mean by overzealous pattern matching.