Having started using emacs in the 80s, it’s strange to read about it being the power-efficient choice now.
I agree it was for you, but it had well-earned the “eight megabytes and constantly swapping” reputation 35 years ago.
Having started using emacs in the 80s, it’s strange to read about it being the power-efficient choice now.
I agree it was for you, but it had well-earned the “eight megabytes and constantly swapping” reputation 35 years ago.