It's not. European is a descriptor of sovereignty here, not one of geography.
Is your wallet yours, even if you leave it somewhere?
It's not. European is a descriptor of sovereignty here, not one of geography.
Is your wallet yours, even if you leave it somewhere?
So use the right words: "greenland is the property of denmark"
That's what the possessive descriptor "European" means, yes. Which is why it's weird you're so against it. I'm not really sure what you're arguing at this point.
"European" is a geographic adjective. It does not apply to domination of other places. No amount of willpower will make the places that europe chooses to rape "european".
It's not purely geographic. It's possessive, it's cultural.
A Spanish dish is Spanish outside of Spain as well, as is a French song or a Danish person (the relevant one in this case!).
> It's possessive, it's cultural.
So you admit that the relationship between denmark and greenland is one of violence, not affection?
It's one of ownership. That's what possessive means.
Yes. You're talking about a relationship born of violence. Who would ever endorse this?
Thats how literally all state sovereignty everywhere in the world works.
Ok, so why cry over greenland when you know how this works?
Who's crying? We're defending our interest.