> Whatever placeholder you use is part of your development process, whether it ships or not. Saying they used none when they did is not cool and rightfully makes one wonder what other uses they may be hiding (or “forgetting”). Especially when apparently they only clarified it when it was too late.
If it was malicious they wouldn't say a word. They probably interpreted the rule as "nothing in shipped game is AI" (which is reasonable interpreteation IMO), they implemented policy to replace any asset made by AI and just missed some texture.
Also the term was pretty vague, like, is using automatic lipsync forbidden ? That's pretty much generative AI, just the result is not picture but a sequence of movements.
> If it was malicious they wouldn't say a word.
They didn’t have a choice, it was obvious it was AI. They might still have other places where they used it but it’s harder to notice.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46344279
Malicious or not, they didn't follow the rules, and admitted as much. So why is it a problem they lose the award?