Non-relational databases existed in the 60s, and many programmers who worked in the 60s presumably continued working into the 70s, so either way I don't see any problems with the timeline GP mentions.
Non-relational databases existed in the 60s, and many programmers who worked in the 60s presumably continued working into the 70s, so either way I don't see any problems with the timeline GP mentions.
Sure, I never claimed that relational databases were the first ones. I was confused because they were trying to explain a specific timeline different from the article, but only mentioned a single time period that didn't seem likely to be what they intended, and I thought it might make sense to clarify what that time period was. I'm sure this isn't the case for everyone, but at least to me, it's surprising not to be explicit in the information they were trying to claim the article glossed over.