In the US at least, duty to protect and serve is just a marketing slogan.
There are multiple court cases decisions showing that police have no duty to protect people. All the way up to the Supreme Court
In the US at least, duty to protect and serve is just a marketing slogan.
There are multiple court cases decisions showing that police have no duty to protect people. All the way up to the Supreme Court
"Protect and Serve" (the State)
(the status quo)
Accurate. Systemic perturbations are typically bad for most "old money".