> His research addressed "complex problems lurking at the center of fusion vacuum chambers and at the edges of the universe", according to the university's obituary.
>He also studied how to harness clean "fusion power" to combat climate change, CBS said.
Clean energy is pretty controversial in US. Most people are against it.
> In an open-ended question, 69% of respondents identified the primary advantage of clean energy as some form of environmental protection, like mitigating climate change or improving air and water quality. Only 13% offered lower energy costs as a central benefit, and 22% said clean energy offers no clear advantage.
https://www.thirdway.org/memo/poll-shows-americans-want-affo...
“Most people” is not even remotely accurate.
> Clean energy is pretty controversial in US. Most people are against it.
It'll be the same cabal that killed the inventor of the engine mod that allowed for 99mpg.
I would more easily believe that this is some fuckery with Iran.
And to be frank, both are pretty far fetched. His thing was plasma and fusion.
If people want a conspiracy theory, tell them to go with alien civilizations wanted to prevent humans from achieving fusion.