> "Science" of the 1900s
Science of any kind, looked at dispassionately, is more of a cult than we're prepared to admit. Not a discussion we're going to have any time soon, not until the miracles run out.
> "Science" of the 1900s
Science of any kind, looked at dispassionately, is more of a cult than we're prepared to admit. Not a discussion we're going to have any time soon, not until the miracles run out.
Could you leave us some hints about what you are alluding to ?
Or even better, clearly and honestly spell out what you actually think?
I can’t speak for the author, but I attended a science conference earlier this year that was almost half science, half healing/meditation workshops. I’m not going to name names, but there were some pretty big academic names there who also have clearly woken up to modern science being more than a bit cult like. Research a couple of areas of science that are currently verboten and see who & what you find there maybe?
It’s just quiet whispers in small conferences at the moment, but this is how the breaking of all spells begins. The momentum is & will continue to build, and probably quicker than many imagine (or will like!).
I've been a professional scientist for more than 30 years, and have no experiences like this at all.
A scientist names names. Not doing so is innuendo, and prevents any verification.
Would you mind naming the exact field or the topic of the conference?
Because of course "science" is a term that's been quite often usurped by all kind of snake oil sellers, but that's nothing new is it?
This sounds vaguely terrifying!
And intentionally so. "I'm not going to name names, but Many Famous People have done X! You'd be shocked if I backed my claims up with any support whatsoever, but I can't, because <vague morality implications>..."