The charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR
> The charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR
He wasn’t convicted, so that’s not been proved to be against the law in this case, so it doesn’t support the argument you’re advancing in this thread.
> The charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR
He wasn’t convicted, so that’s not been proved to be against the law in this case, so it doesn’t support the argument you’re advancing in this thread.